Chesa Andini Saputra, Alfi Dinilhaq, Bambang Ismoyo, Jakarta – Indonesia's financial regulators staged an extraordinary collective retreat on Friday, resigning in rapid succession after a sharp market sell-off rattled investor confidence and exposed long-standing weaknesses in market governance.
Within hours, the heads of both the stock exchange and the country's top financial regulator stepped aside, following a rout that briefly erased nearly 18% of share prices and forced repeated trading halts. The coordinated withdrawal was without precedent and underscored the fragility of confidence in Southeast Asia's largest economy.
The first to go was Iman Rachman, president director of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Two days of heavy losses in the Jakarta Composite Index (JCI), triggered by scrutiny from global index provider MSCI and compounded by bearish analyst calls, proved decisive. "As a form of responsibility," he said, announcing his resignation from the exchange's headquarters.
By afternoon, Mahendra Siregar, chairman of the Financial Services Authority (OJK), Indonesia's financial watchdog, also stepped down. He was followed by Inarno Djajadi, the official overseeing capital markets, and deputy commissioner I.B. Aditya Jayaantara. Late in the evening, the regulator's vice-chairman, Mirza Adityaswara, joined them.
Never before have Indonesia's market institutions shed their leadership so swiftly – or so publicly.
The government was quick to distance itself from the drama. Prasetyo Hadi, the state secretary, said the resignations were personal decisions and denied any political pressure. The government, he added, has no authority over appointments at either the exchange or the regulator. Indonesia's economic fundamentals, he insisted, remain sound.
How it unravelled
The catalyst was a sudden loss of confidence. After briefly crossing the 9,000 mark for the first time, the JCI reversed sharply when MSCI froze several index-related actions involving Indonesian stocks, citing concerns over free-float transparency and concentrated ownership. Goldman Sachs added to the gloom by downgrading Indonesian equities.
MSCI warned that unless these shortcomings are addressed by May, Indonesia risks being demoted from emerging- to frontier-market status. Such a downgrade would be catastrophic. Goldman Sachs estimates that passive funds tracking MSCI indices could withdraw as much as $7.8 billion (Rp130.9 trillion). If FTSE Russell were to follow suit, total outflows could exceed $13 billion – an uncomfortable prospect for a market that remains heavily reliant on foreign capital.
Markets steadied somewhat after the resignations and an initial policy response. On Friday, the JCI rebounded by 1.2%, snapping a bruising two-day slump.
Even before the departures, regulators had begun scrambling to contain the damage. On Thursday, OJK said it would raise the minimum public shareholding, or free-float, requirement to 15%, double the current threshold, and accelerate reforms on ownership disclosure and market governance. Mahendra had also pledged – hours before resigning – to temporarily relocate the regulator's operations to the stock exchange to ensure reforms were implemented "quickly and effectively".
On Friday, OJK sought to reassure investors that the exits would not disrupt supervision. The resignations, it said, were submitted in accordance with the law, and operations would continue under interim leadership.
"Mahendra has said that the resignation is a form of moral responsibility to support the necessary recovery steps," an OJK statement said.
A pause, not a cure
Some see opportunity in the turmoil. Piter Abdullah, an economist, argues that the episode should be treated as an overdue moment to confront structural weaknesses that have long troubled investors – from opaque ownership structures to uneven enforcement of governance rules. But he cautions against haste.
"Reform is necessary, but it must not be rushed," he said. Previous episodes, he added, show that regulatory overcorrection under market pressure can create fresh vulnerabilities rather than resolve old ones.
Piter believes Indonesia still has time. MSCI's review window runs until May 2026, giving regulators several months to demonstrate tangible progress. Used wisely, the period could help restore credibility before any formal reclassification.
Others are less optimistic. Bhima Yudhistira, executive director of the Center of Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS), warned that the wave of resignations had shocked market participants and could deepen mistrust. International investors, he said, may question not only Indonesia's rules, but also the stability of the institutions meant to enforce them.
For now, markets have been given a pause. Investors will be watching closely to see whether Indonesia uses it.
Source: https://jakartaglobe.id/business/indonesias-market-meltdown-claims-its-regulator